Home / OCR / GPT-4o vs PaddleOCR
Comparison

GPT-4o vs PaddleOCR: API vs Open Source

December 2025. Same invoice. Different approaches.

GPT-4o costs money but thinks. PaddleOCR is free but extracts. I tested both to find out when the thinking is worth paying for.

The Test

Same invoice, both systems, measured everything.

Sample invoice used for OCR testing

Test invoice. 800x600 pixels, white background, standard fonts.

The Results

Metric PaddleOCR GPT-4o
Time 4.85s 7.58s
Confidence 99.6% N/A
Character errors 0 0
Table structure Lost Preserved
Cost per image $0 ~$0.01
Tokens used N/A 943

The Key Difference: Structure

Both got every character right. Zero errors. The difference is what they did with the table.

PaddleOCR Output

INVOICE
Invoice #: INV-2025-001
Date: December 16, 2025
Bill To:
John Smith
123 Main Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Description
Qty
Price
Total
Web Development Services
40
$150.00
$6,000.00
...

"Description", "Qty", "Price", "Total" are separate lines. The table became a list of words. If you want to know that "Web Development Services" costs "$150.00", you need to write code to reconstruct that relationship.

GPT-4o Output

INVOICE

Invoice #: INV-2025-001
Date: December 16, 2025

Bill To:
John Smith
123 Main Street
San Francisco, CA 94102

Description                 Qty   Price         Total
Web Development Services    40    $150.00     $6,000.00
UI/UX Design                20    $125.00     $2,500.00
Server Hosting (Annual)      1     $480.00       $480.00

                            Subtotal:        $8,980.00
                            Tax (8.5%):       $763.30
                            Total:          $9,743.30

The table headers align with values. You can see that "Web Development Services" has Qty 40, Price $150.00, Total $6,000.00. GPT-4o understood the document.

When to Pay for GPT-4o

GPT-4o wins when you need to understand documents, not just extract text:

  • Tables with complex layouts
  • Documents where you want to ask questions ("What's the total?")
  • Mixed content with forms, tables, and text
  • Small batches where $0.01/image is irrelevant

When PaddleOCR is Better

PaddleOCR wins when you're processing at scale and can write your own parsing logic:

  • 100,000 documents = $1,000 with GPT-4o, $0 with PaddleOCR
  • Privacy-sensitive documents that can't leave your server
  • Consistent document formats where you can write regex
  • Batch processing where speed matters more than structure

The Code

PaddleOCR

from paddleocr import PaddleOCR

ocr = PaddleOCR(lang='en')
result = ocr.predict('invoice.png')

for item in result:
    for text in item.get('rec_texts', []):
        print(text)

GPT-4o

import base64
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

with open('invoice.png', 'rb') as f:
    img = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode()

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": [
        {"type": "text", "text": "Extract all text from this image."},
        {"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": f"data:image/png;base64,{img}"}}
    ]}]
)

print(response.choices[0].message.content)

The Hybrid Approach

For production systems, consider both:

  1. Use PaddleOCR for bulk processing (cheap, fast)
  2. Send complex or failed documents to GPT-4o (accurate, understands structure)
  3. Extract with PaddleOCR, then ask GPT-4o questions about the text

This gives you 99% of documents at $0/each and 1% at $0.01/each.

My Recommendation

Use PaddleOCR when: High volume. Budget matters. Consistent document formats. Privacy requirements.

Use GPT-4o when: Complex layouts. Tables. Document Q&A. Small batches. Structure matters.

Start with PaddleOCR. It's free and handles most cases. When you hit documents it struggles with - complex tables, mixed layouts - send those to GPT-4o.

More