Home / OCR / Benchmarks / abide-i

abide-i

Unknown

OCR benchmark

21
Total Results
17
Models Tested
2
Metrics
2025-12-19
Last Updated

accuracy

Higher is better

Rank Model Score Source
1 plymouth-dl-model

98% on 884 participant subset. Highlights visual cortex regions.

98 research-paper
2 mcbert

Multi-modal CNN-BERT with leave-one-site-out cross-validation. Combines brain MRI and meta-features.

93.4 research-paper
3 ae-fcn

Autoencoder + FCN combining fMRI and sMRI data (Rakic et al., 2020).

85 research-paper
4 multi-atlas-dnn

Multi-atlas deep neural network with hinge loss. 79.13% on augmented data.

78.07 research-paper
5 asd-swnet

Shared-weight feature extraction network. Precision: 76.15%, Recall: 80.65%.

76.52 research-paper
6 maacnn

Multi-attention CNN. AUC: 0.79 on ABIDE-I.

75.12 research-paper
7 al-negat

Adversarial learning-based node-edge graph attention network. 1,007 subjects across 17 sites.

74.7 research-paper
8 braingnn

ROI-aware graph convolutional network. Interpretable biomarker discovery. 1,035 subjects.

73.3 research-paper
9 gcn

Graph Convolutional Network combining fMRI and sMRI with max voting.

72.2 research-paper
10 multi-task-transformer

Multi-task transformer neural network on UM dataset. Attention mechanism for feature extraction.

72 research-paper
11 phgcl-ddgformer

Graph contrastive learning with graph transformer. 74.8% sensitivity.

70.9 research-paper
12 svm-connectivity

Support Vector Machine with functional connectivity features. Classic baseline comparison.

70.1 research-paper
13 deep-learning-heinsfeld

Deep learning approach by Heinsfeld et al. (2017). Anterior-posterior brain connectivity disruption.

70 research-paper
14 mvs-gcn

Multi-view Site Graph Convolutional Network handling multi-site variability.

69.38 research-paper
15 abraham-connectomes

Participant-specific functional connectivity matrices (Abraham et al., 2017).

67 research-paper
16 random-forest

Random Forest baseline. Sensitivity: 69%, Specificity: 58%.

63 research-paper

auc

Higher is better

Rank Model Score Source
1 asd-swnet

AUC-ROC score for autism vs typical control classification.

81 research-paper
2 braingт

Graph Transformer for brain disorder diagnosis. Significantly outperforms BrainNetTF (73.2%).

78.7 research-paper
3 gcn

Best performing model in comprehensive comparison study (2024).

78 research-paper
4 svm-connectivity

Traditional ML baseline with functional connectivity matrices.

77 research-paper
5 mvs-gcn

Multi-view approach addressing site heterogeneity.

69.01 research-paper