icdar-2003 is a state-of-the-art machine learning benchmark indexed on Codesota. This page tracks published model results, top scores per metric, and the SOTA timeline for icdar-2003.
Accuracy is the reported evaluation metric for icdar-2003. Codesota tracks published model scores on this metric so readers can compare state-of-the-art results across sources and model families.
Higher is better
| Rank | Model | Trust | Score | Year | Links | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Yet Another Text Recognizer | verified | 97.1 | 2021 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 02 | SIGA_T | verified | 97 | 2022 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 03 | SATRN | verified | 96.7 | 2019 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 04 | SAFL | verified | 95 | 2022 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 05 | DAN | verified | 95 | 2019 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 06 | CSTR | verified | 94.8 | 2021 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 07 | Baek et al. | verified | 94.4 | 2019 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 08 | ViTSTR | verified | 94.3 | 2021 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 09 | AON | verified | 91.5 | 2017 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 10 | RARE | verified | 90.1 | 2016 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 11 | STAR-Net | verified | 89.9 | 2016 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |
| 12 | CRNN | verified | 89.4 | 2015 | Paper ↗Code ↗ | Looks wrong? |