Codesota · Benchmark · BixBenchHome/Leaderboards/Science, Medicine & Industry/Bioinformatics Agents/BixBench
Unknown

BixBench.

50+ real-world biological data-analysis scenarios with ~300 open-answer questions designed to measure LLM agents on long, multi-step analytical trajectories.

Paper Leaderboard
§ 01 · Leaderboard

Results by metric.

Only 2 models on this benchmark
Help build the community leaderboard — submit your model results.
Found a wrong score or missing run?
Use row edits to send a sourced correction into moderation.
Add / edit result Report issue

Accuracy

Accuracy is the reported evaluation metric for BixBench. Codesota tracks published model scores on this metric so readers can compare state-of-the-art results across sources and model families.

Higher is better

Trust tiers for Accuracyverifiedpapervendorcommunityunverified
RankModelTrustScoreYearLinksFix
01GPT-4o
Open-answer accuracy. From BixBench paper abstract: frontier models achieve ~17%. Per-model number not yet cross-checked against table in paper body.
paper17N/APaper ↗Looks wrong?
02Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Open-answer accuracy. From BixBench paper abstract: frontier models achieve ~17%. Per-model number not yet cross-checked against table in paper body.
paper17N/APaper ↗Looks wrong?
§ 04 · Submit a result

Add to the leaderboard.

← Back to Bioinformatics Agents