Model card
HTLM (fine-tuning).
UnknownunknownUnknown paramsUnknown
Imported from Papers With Code
§ 01 · Benchmarks
Every benchmark HTLM (fine-tuning) has a recorded score for.
| # | Benchmark | Area · Task | Metric | Value | Rank | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | dart | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | mover | 0.5% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 02 | e2e | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bleu | 70.3% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 03 | e2e | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | meteor | 46.3% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 04 | e2e | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | nist | 8.9% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 05 | webnlg-(all) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | meteor | 0.4% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 06 | webnlg-(all) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bleu | 55.6% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 07 | webnlg-(seen) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | meteor | 0.5% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 08 | webnlg-(seen) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | ter | 0.3% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 09 | webnlg-(seen) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bleu | 65.4% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 10 | webnlg-(unseen) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | meteor | 0.4% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 11 | webnlg-(unseen) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bleu | 48.4% | #1 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 12 | dart | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | ter | 0.4% | #2 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 13 | e2e | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | cider | 2.5% | #2 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 14 | webnlg-(all) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | ter | 0.4% | #2 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 15 | webnlg-(unseen) | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | ter | 0.5% | #2 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 16 | dart | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bert | 0.9% | #5 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 17 | dart | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bleu | 47.2% | #5 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 18 | dart | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | bleurt | 0.4% | #5 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 19 | dart | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | meteor | 0.4% | #5 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
| 20 | e2e | Computer Vision · Optical Character Recognition | rouge-l | 70.8% | #5 | 2021-07-14 | source ↗ |
Rank column shows this model’s position vs all other models scored on the same benchmark + metric (competitors after the slash). #1 in red means current SOTA. Sorted by rank, then newest result.
§ 02 · Strengths by area
Where HTLM (fine-tuning) actually performs.
§ 03 · Papers
1 paper with results for HTLM (fine-tuning).
- 2021-07-14· Computer Vision· 20 results
HTLM: Hyper-Text Pre-Training and Prompting of Language Models
§ 04 · Related models
Other Unknown models scored on Codesota.
fglihai
Unknown params · 6 results · 1 SOTA
CLIP4STR-L
Unknown params · 1 result · 1 SOTA
USYD NLP_CS29-2
Unknown params · 6 results
Corner-based Region Proposals
Unknown params · 3 results
EAST + VGG16
Unknown params · 3 results
SSTD
Unknown params · 3 results
TextBoxes++_MS
Unknown params · 3 results
WordSup (VGG16-synth-coco)
Unknown params · 3 results
§ 05 · Sources & freshness
Where these numbers come from.
papers-with-code
20
results
20 of 20 rows marked verified.