Codesota · Natural Language Processing · Language Modeling · IFEvalTasks/Natural Language Processing/Language Modeling
Language Modeling · benchmark dataset · ENGLISH

Instruction-Following Eval.

A straightforward and easy-to-reproduce evaluation benchmark for large language models focused on instruction-following capabilities. IFEval contains around 500 prompts (541 in the train split) with verifiable instructions that can be objectively evaluated by heuristics, such as "write in more than 400 words", "mention the keyword of AI at least 3 times", "use no commas", or "include at least 3 highlighted sections". The benchmark identifies 25 types of verifiable instructions including punctuation constraints, length requirements, detectable content/format requirements, and keyword usage. Each prompt contains one or more verifiable instructions with corresponding kwargs for verification. This benchmark is designed for evaluating chat or instruction fine-tuned language models and is one of the core benchmarks used in the Open LLM Leaderboard.

Paper Submit a result
§ 01 · Leaderboard

Best published scores.

1 result indexed across 1 metric. Shaded row marks current SOTA; ties broken by submission date.


Primary
Accuracy · higher is better
Accuracy· primary
1 row
#ModelOrgSubmittedPaper / codeAccuracy
01Qwen2.5-PlusDec 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Report · code86.30
Fig 2 · Rows sorted by score within each metric. Shaded row marks SOTA. Dates reflect model or paper release where available, otherwise the date Codesota accessed the source.
§ 03 · Progress

1 steps
of state of the art.

Each row below marks a model that broke the previous record on Accuracy. Intermediate submissions are kept in the leaderboard above; only SOTA-setting entries are re-listed here.

Higher scores win. Each subsequent entry improved upon the previous best.

SOTA line · Accuracy
  1. Dec 19, 2024Qwen2.5-Plus86.30
Fig 3 · SOTA-setting models only. 1 entries span Dec 2024 Dec 2024.
§ 04 · Literature

1 paper
tied to this benchmark.

Every paper below corresponds to at least one row in the leaderboard above. Click through for the arXiv preprint and, when available, the reference implementation.

  • Qwen2.5 Technical Report
    Qwen:An YangBaosong YangBeichen ZhangBinyuan HuiBo ZhengBowen YuChengyuan LiDayiheng LiuFei HuangHaoran WeiHuan LinJian YangJianhong TuJianwei ZhangJianxin YangJiaxi YangJingren ZhouJunyang LinKai DangKeming LuKeqin BaoKexin YangLe YuMei LiMingfeng XuePei ZhangQin ZhuRui MenRunji LinTianHao LiTianyi TangTingyu XiaXingzhang RenXuancheng RenYang FanYang SuYichang ZhangYu WanYuqiong LiuZeyu CuiZhenru ZhangZihan Qiu
    Dec 2024·Qwen2.5-Plus
§ 06 · Contribute

Have a score that beats
this table?

Submit a checkpoint and a reproduction script. We will run it, publish the score, and — if it takes the top — annotate the step on the progress chart with your name.

Submit a result Read submission guide
What a submission needs
  • 01A public checkpoint or API endpoint
  • 02A reproduction script with frozen commit + seed
  • 03Declared evaluation environment (Python, deps)
  • 04One row per metric declared by this dataset
  • 05A contact so we can follow up on discrepancies